Business Research Method Research Proposal Has Successfully Implemente

Question: Describe about the Case Study for Business Research Method Research Proposal Has Successfully Implemented? Answer: Introduction Topic Evaluation of the Sustainability Strategies Implemented By Carillion Plc for Enhancing Profitability and Market Reputation in the UK Background Most of the leading construction companies throughout the world are formulating various sustainability strategies to gain long-term growth and to make the world better. Short-term profit may satisfy the investors, but it may also affect the companies regarding sustainability (Cumming 2013). Also, the UK government has implemented the Zero Carbon Buildings policy for achieving the CCA target and for managing various other significant issues such as energy security and fuel poverty (Almeidaet al. 2015). The construction companies in the UK must have to operate their business by the Zero Carbon Buildings policy. As per this policy, all new homes from 2016 require for mitigating, through several measures, all the emissions of carbon that is synthesized on-site as an outcome of the usage of regulated energy (Longoni, Golini and Cagliano 2014). Implementation of this policy in construction business in the United King is important in terms of enhancing sustainability of a company (Wolmarans et al. 2014). The current study conducts systematic investigation into the sustainability strategies implemented by Carillion plc using various studies and materials related to construction management, sustainability and company background (Barnett, Darnall and Husted 2015). Company Background Carillion is a Public Limited Company in the United Kingdom. It is also a British construction services as well as a multinational facilities management company (Carillion plc 2016). This company undertakes several projects of construction incorporating hospitals and roads. One of the major strategies followed by this company is to provide a selective high-quality capability of construction (Carillion plc 2016). Transferring skills as well as knowledge to existing and new markets is another key strategy of this organization (Carillion plc 2016). Through this strategy, this organization can make an expansion of their services and activities of infrastructure. The total number of employees working in this organization is about 40000. Research Question How the construction companies like Carillion Plc are managing their business operations in accordance with the Zero Carbon Buildings policy? Research Objectives This particular research would be conducted based on few specific aims or objectives regarding the sustainable strategies those have been made by Carillion Plc. On the basis of S.M.A.R.T criteria, the objectives of the study can be assessed as: To evaluate the importance of sustainable strategies for enhancing profitability and market reputation in the construction industry of the United Kingdom To identify the impacts of Zero Carbon Policy (implemented by the UK Government) for managing sustainable growth and the green agenda in the context of the construction business To analyze the sustainable strategies implemented by Carillion Plc to increase their market reputation and profitability in the United Kingdom To assess the recommended ways to improve the sustainable strategies of Carillion Plc Indicative Literature Review 1250 Sustainability is becoming rapidly a potential force in the construction industry after the identification of several negative problems as well as issues regarding the business environment as put forward by Kuuksayra (2015). On the other side as argued by Scheirer (2013) one of the paths through which the objectives of sustainability can be achieved in the built environment is for implementing the sustainable construction as well as design. It can also mediate the negative impacts of the construction industry on the natural environment (Werbach 2013). Several organizations have made sustainable construction as well as design through the Zero Carbon Policy (McLeod, Hopfe and Rezgui 2012). According to the demonstration made by Loorbach and Wijsman,(2013), only 9 % of the construction organizations basically make the transformation of the sustainability into the daily practices and their organization as well. Thus, it is very crucial for developing the strategies of organizational tran sformation that makes enable the organizations for adopting and implementing successfully the sustainability and taking company benefit of its potential advantages as opined by Cumming (2013). Furthermore, Organizational Transformation Model of Sustainability can resolve the sustainability in their business as well as corporate practices. It can improve eventually the business in the market of competitive construction. Sustainable Construction Activities and Practices The development of the strategies of organizational information as well as the OTMS, it was very essential for categorizing and identifying the major sustainable activities and practices in a certain construction company as well as project (Almeidaet al. 2015). These sustainable activities as well as practices can make the demonstration why a construction organization executes the practices of construction. Furthermore, it is very essential for identifying the challenges as well as the benefits associated with the implementation of sustainability in the construction projects (Longoni, Golini and Cagliano 2014). The key challenges or barriers associated with sustainable design as well as construction are as follows: Sustainable construction and designs first cost premium. Tendency for maintaining the current practices. Limiting knowledge of sustainability as well as understanding from the subcontractors. Recovery of the savings of long-term those not reflected in the structure that is service free (Wolmaranset al. 2014). High cost for sustainable products as well as materials. Key Components of Successful Strategy There are several major components of the successful sustainability strategies of a specific company. These are as follows: Elevation of the sustainability in the governance of a company, incorporating direct board oversight as well as accountability over the social and environmental issues, more special and diversity expertise on boards (Barnett, Darnall and Husted 2015). This component also links the executive as well as other compensation of employee towards the goals of sustainability (Kksayra 2015). Regular robust dialogues with the key stakeholders of the company on the challenges of sustainability, incorporating the employee, investors, consumers as well as the suppliers. Open reporting on the accomplishments, goals and strategies of the sustainability (Scheirer 2013). Supporting Sustainability at the time of Developing Strategy The sustainability has to be incorporated into the strategy of an initiative from the initial stage so that the plans for what would take place while the funding ends are included at the outset. The process of sustainability development has been demonstrated in the fig 1. The figure can also show the evaluation and evaluators as featuring multiple stages of the development of sustainability strategies as argued by Loorbachand Wijsman (2013). For example, elevators can also offer the details in the form of the assessment or the analysis of needs of funding trends for supporting the analysis of strategies. They can feature also the strategic planning aspects like the development of the theory of initiative of change or its objectives and goals (Cumming2013). Fig 1: Relation between the Sustainability strategy Development and Evaluation (Source:Almeida et al. 2014) Supporting Sustainability at the time of Evaluation Sustainability can be supported by the evaluation by treating the sustainability as a parameter to be tracked and operationalized in a specific timeline, encouraging learning from the early stages of an initiative (Wolmarans et al. 2014). Some evaluators take it as very purposeful approach either in their reporting or their evaluation design (Longoni, Golini and Cagliano 2014). Sustainability can become the thought of as a way for ensuring continuation of at least four aspects of initiative: Funding for the projects or organizations of the initiative. The values, beliefs, principles and ideas that underlie the initiative (Scheirer 2013). Relationships through which the initiative encourages or supports and The outcomes of the initiative Evaluators have to operationalize sustainability once the right focus is determined so the evaluation can track that over time (Barnett, Darnall and Husted 2015). The indicators articulation for tracking the areas depends on the initiative being evaluated (Kksayra 2015). Zero Carbon Policy Background The government of the United Kingdom has made a commitment towards the green agenda and the sustainable growth (McLeod, Hopfeand Rezgui2012). This policy has been derived through multiple legally binding standards and targets, from that the Climate Change Act 2008 (CCA) has been considered as one of the most essential act (Lees and Sexton 2014). The policy of Zero Carbon Buildings generates the part of the wider strategy of the Government for achieving the target of CCA (Pan 2014). On the other hand, time assists in tackling other crucial consequences at the same time incorporating fuel poverty and energy security (Heffernanet al. 2015). Definition and Significance of Zero Carbon Policy As set out today, this policy needs all new homes or buildings from 2016 onwards for mitigating, through several measures, all the emissions of Carbon synthesized on-site as an outcome of the regulated usage of the energy (Panand Ning2015). It incorporates energy utilized for providing space cooling and heating, fixed lighting and hot water as outlined in the Building Regulations Part LIA (Fayet al. 2015). These emissions resulting from the plug-in and cooking appliances like televisions as well as computers are not being resolved as the part of the policy (Leesand Sexton2014). This particular policy is aligned with the European policy, more precisely, the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (recast) that needs all new buildings or construction being near Zero Energy Buildings from 2020 (Gibbs and ONeill 2015). There are mainly three key demands that must be all met for a building construction for qualifying as zero carbon: At a minimum, the fabric performance must comply with the demonstrated standard that is known as the Fabric Energy Efficiency Standard (FEES) and Any emission of Carbon dioxide that remain after the ventilation, fixed lighting, cooling, and heating consideration must be equal or less than that of the emissions of Carbon compliance limit built for the Zero Carbon Homes and Any remaining emissions of Carbon Dioxide, from the regulated sources of energy must be minimized Zero (McLeod, Hopfeand Rezgui2012). Methodology Research methodology is the area that helps to define the suitable method that requires to be considered in terms of acquiring the complete as well as detailed process requirement. Methodology is the chapter that helps to have a deepened analytical and understanding view of the subject with the help of the methods of research (Robson and McCartan 2016). Types of Investigation Research Onion Figure 2: Research Onion (Source: Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2012) The diagram of research is mainly based on three different philosophies namely Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology. Thus, the understanding and selection of the philosophy require proper knowledge as the execution of the research could depend on the selection of research philosophies. As stated by Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2012), the Ontology philosophy is mainly concerned with the nature of reality. On the other side, Epistemology is usually concerned with identifying the facts asking what the useful knowledge is. Lastly, Axiology facilitates to understand and recognize the role, their opinions and values that play an important role in collecting and analyzing the research. The layer of research onion starts with objectivism and ends with layer data collection. Research Philosophy The key facts those have been previously established and have to be tested in terms of multiple scientific methods those are generally known as the Positivism Philosophy (Mackey and Gass 2015). Moreover, Interpretivism is also known as the philosophies that is publicly created by the human being through the perception and dont involve any kind of data examination (Panneerselvam 2014). Clarification to selectpositivism research philosophy This study is based on the deductive procedure that is one of the key reasons for selecting the positivism philosophy. The entire study is implemented with the help of secondary informationas well as it is one of the key causes for selecting the positivism philosophy. Several data those are the most essential to the research are gathered from various journals and books. It would have a deepened connectivity with topic of the proposal. The official website of Carillion would be analysed for gaining access towards multiple financial statements of the company that would set the financial position and standings of the enterprise. Strength and limitation of positivism philosophy One of the major strength of positivism research philosophy is it helps to carry forward the research with intensive secondary information. The research can be conducted with the evidences of previous researches. Moreover, positivism research philosophy entirely relies on the quantitative data; the research provides desired results with scientific approaches. On the other side, some major limitation of positivism of research philosophy is that positivists believe that the objective interference as well as conclusion could be reached as the long as the individual doing the observation. However, it is observed that human behaviour usually comes with emotional responses. Research approach There are two verypopular research approaches such as inductive and deductive approach. Particular approach where researchers makeanalysis the previous research that was made on the same subject is called the deductive approach (Blumberg, Cooper and Schindler, 2014). Clarification for selecting deductive approach The researcher would select the deductive approach because the research is mainly made depending on secondary sources of data those are gathered with the help of multiple websites associated with books as well as journals that comes in handy about the research subject and has a deepened connectivity with the subject. Strength and limitation of deductive approach: The strength of deductive approach is associated with the facts that principles of deductive approach are based on the scene and the movement is done from the theoretical underpinning to data. The deductive approach is associated with the quantitative data; thus, it follows the scientific approach. On the contrary it does not explore the meaning of human attachment and overall research contexts are not understood effective. In addition, the research is not considered to be the part of the research. Research Design This research design section has three multiple options for selecting for the researcher those are as follows: Exploratory Design the explanatory design is adapted by the researcher at the time while the researcher faces consequences about the complete understanding of problem and is having also the relevant documents scarcity (Pickard 2012). Explanatory Design the researcher would use explanatory design at this section of time for proving their statement with effective and desired examples in terms of creating a particular relationship among different variables those are utilized during the cause (Robson and McCartan 2016). Descriptive Design when, the research topic would have high opportunity to be implemented at that particular time, the researcher develops the descriptive style research. Clarification to select descriptive design The study has a wide range of opportunity for exploring the several sustainability strategies of CarillionPlc and the evaluation of these strategies. Huge information can be collected in terms of the secondary data collection. Therefore, the researcher would prefer the descriptive design. Strength and limitation of descriptive research design With the help of descriptive research design, it is easy to use the specific forms of data collection. This may include the case studies, observation and survey, etc. The implementation of the approach could provide a multifaceted approach for data gathering. One of the major limitations of the descriptive research design is the confidentiality. It has been observed that often subjects are not truthful as they are considered. The researchers find it difficult to assess the data at the time of interview. Sampling This research would be mainly implemented based on the secondary data collection methods and therefore, the information collected by the equivalent method would be kept in terms of completing the entire course of the research successfully. Data Collection Method data can normally be gathered for a particular research by the two different methods those are called the secondary as well as the primary data collection methodology (Mackey and Gass 2015). This current research is comprised of inly the secondary information and therefore, it is the major cause that the data are gathered in terms of the quantitative data. Secondary data Collection In this current section the data are gathered from the several journals as well as books that have deepened connectivity with the subject of the study (Mackey and Gass 2015). Furthermore, several websites that have a relation with the subject of this research study are also utilized along with the official website of Carillion Plc. Primary data collection: In order to understand the importance of sustainability in construction industry, it is necessary to collect primary from the respondents belonging to construction industry. By considering the above-mentioned research questions, the primary data will be collected. In order to collect primary a survey will be conducted among the employees of the organization in construction industry. Quantitative Data data is mainly gathered in this particular section for determining the several problems faced by the construction company Carillion at the time of evaluation of the sustainability issues. It would also be determined based on the several consequences those are collected from several books as well as journals. Accessibility Issues The most complicated part of the several issues was the problems of tremendous low budget and lack of time. Extracting intended information and journals as well as surfing various sites was also a very much hectic segment for completing. Furthermore, several legal formalities should be taken into consideration for running this particular research in a very smooth manner. Time Table (Gantt Chart) Key activities 1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th+5th week 6th week 7th week Selection of the Topic Literature review Research methodology Secondary data collection Data Analysis and Interpretation Findings Conclusion and Recommendation Final submission Summary This particular section of methodology would give several important elements of details or information about the exact outcome as well as the purpose of the research and the overview of the multiple techniques and methods those would be utilized within the entire study. Conclusion This entire study focusing on the Business research method research proposal has successfully implemented the research methodology as well as literature review based on the research question and research objectives. Both the of the sections in the Introduction part have shed light on the goals and research problems with research questions in order to easily conduct the research based on those objectives and questions. Therefore, most importantly, the evaluation that has been implemented in this study of the sustainability strategies of Carillion Plc have clearly shown that it literally enhances the profitability of the company. Reference List Almeida, C.M.V.B., Agostinho, F., Giannetti, B.F. and Huisingh, D., 2015. Integrating cleaner production into sustainability strategies: an introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, pp.1-9. Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2012) Research methods for business students, Page 52, 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall Barnett, M.L., Darnall, N. and Husted, B.W., 2015. Sustainability strategy in constrained economic times. Long Range Planning, 48(2), pp.63-68. Carillionplc.com. (2016). Carillion plc - Support Services - Construction - Making Tomorrow A Better Place. [online] Available at: https://www.carillionplc.com/ [Accessed 15 Mar. 2016]. Cumming, P., 2013. Management Systems for Sustainability: How to Connect Strategy and Action. Do Sustainability. Fay, M., Hallegatte, S., Vogt-Schilb, A., Rozenberg, J., Narloch, U. and Kerr, T., 2015. Decarbonizing development: three steps to a zero-carbon future. World Bank Publications. Flick, U., 2015. Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research project. Sage. Gibbs, D. and ONeill, K., 2015. Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum, 59, pp.133-141. Heffernan, E., Pan, W., Liang, X. and de Wilde, P., 2015. Zero carbon homes: Perceptions from the UK construction industry. Energy Policy, 79, pp.23-36. Kksayra, E., 2015. Design for sustainability in companies: strategies, drivers and needs of Turkey's best performing businesses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp.455-465. Lees, T. and Sexton, M., 2014. An evolutionary innovation perspective on the selection of low and zero-carbon technologies in new housing. Building Research Information, 42(3), pp.276-287. Longoni, A., Golini, R. and Cagliano, R., 2014. The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations. International journal of production economics, 147, pp.147-160. Loorbach, D. and Wijsman, K., 2013. Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp.20-28. Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M., 2015. Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge. McLeod, R.S., Hopfe, C.J. and Rezgui, Y., 2012. An investigation into recent proposals for a revised definition of zero carbon homes in the UK. Energy Policy, 46, pp.25-35. Pan, W. and Ning, Y., 2015. A socio-technical framework of zero-carbon building policies. Building Research Information, 43(1), pp.94-110. Pan, W., 2014. System boundaries of zero carbon buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, pp.424-434. Panneerselvam, R., 2014. Research methodology. PHI Learning Pvt.Ltd.. Robson, C. and McCartan, K., 2016. Real world research. Wiley. Scheirer, M.A., 2013. Linking sustainability research to intervention types. American Journal of Public Health, 103(4), pp.e73-e80. Werbach, A., 2013. Strategy for sustainability: A business manifesto. Harvard business press. Wolmarans, P., Hyland, E., Atherton, S., Bovet, D., Bryan, J. and Cheng, A., 2014. Sustainability Strategies Addressing Supply-chain Air Emissions (No. Project NCFRP-33).